Hearsay Exceptions When Declarant May Be Available

This episode of On Subrogation focuses on the hearsay rule of evidence and exceptions that are allowed regardless of whether the out of court declarant is available to testify. The video discusses the out of court statements that are defined as hearsay under the rule but may be admissible under the 1) Present Sense Impression, 2) Excited utterance, 3) Recorded Recollection, 4) Records of Regularly Conducted Activity, and 5) Judgment of Previous Conviction. Understanding these hearsay rule and these exceptions is particularly important when determining how you will present your evidence to prove your subrogation case and to object to any testimony the defendant is not permitted to present.

Even though this video is brought to you by a law firm, and the host is an attorney, please note that the video does not constitute legal advice and watching it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Rathbone Group - Exceeding Client Expectations - Maximizing Recoveries While Minimizing Costs.

subrogation,rathbone group,jason sullivan,rathbone,sullivan,hearsay,evidence,federal rules,401,403,present,sense,impression,excited,utterance,regular,recorded,recollection,business,activity,memory,testify,witness,declarant,out of court,statement,prior,conviction,admissible,judge,subro,