Real Lawyer Reacts to Democrat’s EMOTIONAL Closing - INSANE!

Evidence is a bi-partisan issue: tell these Senators that the President’s impeachment trial must include witness testimony and documents. Allow subpoenas! Romney: 202-224-5251, Murkowski: 202-224-6665, McSally: 202-224-2235, Gardner: 202-224-5941, Collins: 202-224-2523, Burr: 202-224-3154, Alexander: 202-224-4944

⚖️⚖️⚖️Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my PRELAW COURSE:


©©©©© Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you (15% OFF!):


★ A Few of My Favorite Things★

🕵️‍♂️My Custom Suits:
👔My Ties:
📎My Tie Clips/Bars:
🔲My Pocket Squares:
💈My Hair Product
📸My Video Camera Setup

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary from CNN:
The Senate early Wednesday morning approved rules for the Senate impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on a party-line vote that delays the question of whether the Senate should subpoena witnesses and documents until later in the trial.

The rules resolution from Senate Majority Mitch McConnell was approved 53-47 after Republicans defeated a series of amendments from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on the opening day of the bitterly fought impeachment trial. Schumer proposed 11 amendments seeking to subpoena a trove of documents from the Trump administration and witnesses like acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton, but the amendments were thwarted almost entirely by the same party-line vote, 53-47.

As the debate continued into the early hours of Wednesday morning, tempers increasingly began to flare. Chief Justice John Roberts admonished both the House managers and the President's lawyers after a particularly heated back and forth with House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, White House counsel Pat Cipollone and Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow. Roberts said he was admonishing the two sides "in equal terms to remember that they are addressing the world's greatest deliberative body."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have a suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.

And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!

Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.

★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts:
Laws Broken:
Law 101:
Real Law Review:

All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!

========================================================


★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜
★ Stella’s Insta:
★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here: legaleagle@standard.tv

Legaleagle,legal eagle,breaking news,case,congress,court case,crime,guilty,jury,latest news,news,not guilty,political,politics,politics news,scotus,supreme court,the trial,trial,Verdict,copyright,law advice,legal analysis,lawyer,attorney,Real lawyer,Real law review,impeachment,donald trump,impeachment inquiry,articles of impeachment,impeachment hearing,impeachment vote,